H1N1 Q & A

H1N1 FAQ and Update from the
President of the Malaysian Medical Association




1) Can we distinguish between regular and H1N1 flu, without a lab test?

No, the flu is the flu, but there are variations in presentation. Some symptoms
such as cough, runny nose, fever, body aches, fatigue, vomiting, diarrhoea
occur more or less in every flu patient, but may present differently by different
people. Some infected people have very mild symptoms, some in between,
and a small minority, probably less than 10 per cent, have severe features
including the dangerous pneumonia.

However, from sentinel testing and surveillance by the Ministry of Health the
last few weeks have shown that almost 95 per cent of all flu-like illness are
now caused by the H1N1 virus. Earlier some months ago, seasonal flu
variants caused by the B and other A virus were the main causes, the bug
causing most flu these few days is the A(H1N1). This appears to be the case
also in neighbouring countries, meaning that the new virus is causing more
havoc and symptomatic illness than previous types of flu (which are still in the
community).

Because almost every flu-like illness (influenza-like illness or ILI) is due to
H1N1, the MOH is now recommending that no testing to confirm this H1N1 will
now be offered.

Treat as if this is H1N1 for ILI — symptom relief for mild symptoms
(paracetamol, hydration, cough medicines, etc) and self-quarantine, social
distancing, be alert for complications.

Most (70 per cent) do not need any anti-viral medications such as Tamiflu or
Relenza. Only severe cases need to be referred to hospital for further
treatment.

2) How should doctors decide if a person be given further specific treatment for H1N1?

If after 2-3 days, fever and cough symptoms do not improve, a recheck with
the doctor is recommended, especially if there are features of difficulty
breathing, severe weakness and giddiness, or, if the following risk factors are
present:

1. obesity (fatter patients seem to have poorer outcome and more
complications)
2. those with underlying diabetes, heart disease
3. those with asthma, or chronic lung disease
4. pregnant women
5. those with reduced immunity, cancer patients, etc
6. those with obvious pneumonia features


3) Many anxious people with flu-like symptoms want to be tested or treated for suspected H1N1, but are kept waiting or sent home, without being tested. Is this practice right?

There is no right or wrong practice as this outbreak is extensive and is
stretching our resources to the limit. This is also the case not just here in
Malaysia, but also elsewhere around the entire world!

The recommendation is now not to spend too much time and effort trying to
get tested at designated hospitals or clinics — there is probably no need to do
so. I have been informed that as many as 1,000 patients queue anxiously
at Sungai Buloh Hospital for testing, due to fear of the H1N1 flu.

So the message must be made clear: Most flu illness do not require
confirmatory testing, and are mild and self-limiting. More than 90 per cent will
get better on their own, with symptomatic treatment — just watch out for
possible complications, and risk factors as mentioned above.

Our resources are limited especially for testing. This is not just for Malaysia,
but globally as well. The global demand for test kits and reagents for the H1N1
(PCR) is overextended and are rationed due to this extreme demand.
Some 200 million test kits have been deployed worldwide, but this supply is
critically short because of excessive demand, so most countries have to ration
testing to confirm only the worst cases, so as to monitor the pandemic better.


4) Are doctors confused as to what to do in this outbreak, especially when they do not have ready access to confirmatory lab tests?

Not really. Earlier on there was some confusion as to what to do next and who
to test or who to refer for further testing and admission. Now the rules are
clearer.

There is no need to do any testing to confirm the H1N1 virus for any ILI — just
assume that this is the case in the majority of cases. Treat symptomatically
when symptoms are mild, reassure the patients and ensure that these infected
patients practice good personal hygiene, impose self-quarantine and social
distancing, wear masks if their coughing or sneezing become troublesome,
and keep a watchful eye on whether the infection is getting better or worse.

If there is difficulty breathing and gross weakness, then patients should quickly
present themselves for admission. Understandably this phase of worsening is
not always clear or easily understood by everyone... But there is not much
more that we can do — otherwise we will be admitting too many patients and
this will totally overwhelm our health services.

But prudent caution would help to determine which seriously ill patients need
more attention and more intensive care. Unfortunately however, there will be
that odd patient who will progress unusually quickly and collapse even before
anything can be planned — hopefully these will be few and far between.

A more important note is that all doctors and nursing personnel should be very
aware that they too have to take precautions, and employ barrier contact
practices, if there are patients with cough and cold during this period of H1N1
outbreak, which is expected to last a year or two. Carelessness can result in
the physician or nurse or nurse-aide becoming infected!


5) Are there sufficient guidelines from the Ministry of Health to address this situation?

I think there are sufficient guidelines from the MOH. Although some politicians
have blamed the MOH and the minister for being inept at handling this
pandemic — in truth this is not the case.

It is useful to remember that this is an entirely new or novel virus, which no
one previously had encountered before — thus its infectivity and
contagiousness is quite high and almost no one is immune to this virus.
Perhaps, there will come a time when all the resources from both public and
private sectors can be put to more efficient use. Some logistic problems will
invariably occur, because human beings differ in their capacity to understand
or follow directives, whatever the source or authority.

Also patient demands have been extraordinarily high and at times very difficult
to meet — every patient necessarily feels that his flu is potentially the worst
possible type and therefore requires the most stringent measures and
testing...

Doctors are also unsure as to the seriousness or severity of this new ailment
— and we are only now beginning to understand this better — so our less
than reassuring style when encountering this new H1N1 flu is sometimes
detected by an equally anxious patient and/or their relatives.
But there is only so much that we can do under such a pressure cooker of an
outbreak which is spreading like wildfire! But nevertheless we should not
panic, and remember that most (more than 90 per cent) of infected people will
recover with very little after-effects. Possibly only one in 10 patients develop
more serious problems which necessitate hospitalisation.

6) Is limiting H1N1 testing only to those who have been admitted to hospital justifiable?

I have explained the worldwide shortage of such testing kits and reagents.
Also it is near impossible to test everyone, the world over. Besides, knowing
now that almost all the flu-like illness in the country is due to H1N1 makes it a
moot point to want to test for this, especially when most are mild.

The rationale for testing only those who need hospitalisation is to ensure that
we are dealing with the true virus, and also help to isolate possible changes or
mutations to this viral strain. The MOH is also constantly doing sentinel
surveillance (random spot-testing at various sites around the country to
determine more accurately the various virus types and spread that are
causing ILI).

7) Are we short of anti-virul drugs (Tamiflu, Relenza)? Should I take Tamiflu?

These antiviral drugs were available to most doctors during the earlier scare of
the bird flu virus, but now are severely restricted, although some orders are
still entertained from individual doctors, clinics or hospitals. Remember that
these have been block-booked by more than 167 countries which have been
shown to have been penetrated by the H1N1 flu bug.

Our MOH has actually stockpiled some two million doses of the Tamiflu or its
generic form. In the last inter-ministerial pandemic influenza task force
meeting, this stockpile will be bumped up to 5.5 million doses to cover some
possible 20 per cent of the population.

Right now there is no shortage in the country. It is just that it is not readily
available on demand for anyone just yet. The MOH is still of the opinion that
thisantiviral drug be used prudently and would like to register every patient
given this drug.

The private sector on the other hand would like to have a looser control over
the use of this drug — but we acknowledge that we should be meticulously
prudent in its use. There is a genuine fear that resistant strains to this drug
may develop with indiscriminate and unnecessary use — then we will all be in
trouble with a drug-resistant H1N1 virus run amok!

Drug-resistant strains have been detected in Mexico, border-towns in the US,
Vietnam, Britain, Australia even. So we have to be vigilant and closely monitor
the situation. Right now, the very limited usage of Tamiflu gives us good
reason to be optimistic.

However, because of some unusual patterns of seemingly well people dying
or having very critical infections, some people and doctors are wondering if
these new strains have already reached our shores... or have we been too
late in instituting proper treatment... ?

The rising number of deaths now is quite worrisome, but our health authorities
are watching this development very closely and are also checking the virus
strain to see if this has mutated. We can only hope that this is not the case, for
now.


8) What are some of the problems faced by doctors in dealing with the H1N1 problem?

It would be good if every medical practitioner keeps a close tab on the H1N1
pandemic, and remain fully aware of the developments and changes, which
are evolving daily. Every doctor has to be learning on the trot, so to speak, to
keep up with the progress of this outbreak and its management, so that we
can serve our patients better.

Logging in to the Internet regularly for more updated information will certainly
help, instead of lamenting that not enough is being disseminated via the
media thus far... Every doctor has to be more proactive and practice more
responsible and cautious medicine during this trying period which is expected
to run into at least one to two years. Importantly, look out for lung complications, and the above stated higher risk profiles, and refer these patients quickly for further care.

Easier access to antiviral drugs and their responsible use and monitoring
would help allay public fears of delay in treatment, but this should be
tempered with care and not over-exuberance to dish out to one and all, the
precious antiviral drug, just for prevention — this may be a very bad move
which can inadvertently create a worse outcome of drug-resistant bugs.
However, in the light of the very quick deterioration of some young patients
who have died, it might be prudent to use antiviral treatment earlier and more
aggressively.

We look forward to the specific H1N1 vaccine, when it does come our way,
probably towards the end of the year. In the meantime, encouraging those in
the front-line, heart or lung patients and frequent travellers to have the
seasonal flu vaccination is a useful adjunct to help stem the usual problems
from other flu types.


9) Are we doing everything that should or needs to be done?

Yes, if you check what other nations are doing, we are doing relatively well.
We are not overstating the dangers and we have been quite transparent on
the possibilities of this pandemic. Earlier, many agencies and even the public
and doctors have accused us of exaggerating the pandemic, and our
response was dismissed as being too much, even over the top! Unfortunately,
it was only when some deaths occur that many are now decrying that we have
done too little!

Also if you are quite honest about it, just compare with the countries globally,
and you will notice that no one health or government authority has got this
right, spot on.

We are all learning about this novel flu pandemic, and each country's
response is coloured by its past experiences. In Hong Kong, China, Vietnam,
Singapore and Malaysia we have had the SARS outbreak, so we are
necessarily more paranoid! Also here the experience is that flu does not
usually cause death in our community, unlike the west where seasonal flu kills
some hundreds of thousands every year!

So the fear factor for this H1N1 flu is not nearly as great in the West, although
it is slowly sinking in that its contagiousness and infectivity is far greater, and
fears of its reassortment to a more virulent mutant form are growing, into the
so-called second and/or third wave of this pandemic, but we will not know until
a year or so down the line.


10) Is the public in general doing enough to help in controlling the outbreak?

I think the public is now reasonably well-informed as to this H1N1 pandemic.
Perhaps, they are too well-informed, that they have a fearful approach to this
virus. But the proper thing is not too over-react and to panic, although I know
this does sound easier said than done.

It is almost a certainty that this flu will spread within the community — in
schools, universities, academies, factories, work places, offices, etc. WHO
has projected that possibly some 20-30 per cent of the population worldwide
will become infected by this novel flu bug, after studying various models of
spread of past infections — the huge and very rapid spread worldwide is
mainly due to air travel. While older flu pandemics took six months to extend
to so many countries, this H1N1 flu did so in less than six weeks!

In the worst-case scenarios of course, this outbreak will be alarming —
hospitalisations may be required for 100,000 up to 500,000 Malaysians, with
perhaps as many as 5,000 to 27,000 infected patients (depending on the case
fatality rate or either 0.1 to 0.5 per cent) succumbing to this illness.
But because we have been monitoring closely and containing the outbreak
thus far, with heightened awareness and greater social responsibility, it is
possible to ameliorate the infectivity, spread and fatality that will unfortunately
accompany this pandemic... Just how successful we will be in limiting these
adverse outcomes remains to be seen, but we can be hopeful.

How can the public help? First learn and acquire good personal hygiene. If
sick, please be responsible and stay at home, even in your own room where
possible, wear a face mask (a cheap three-ply surgical mask will do, because
large droplet spread is the main danger). Do not go out, practice what is now
known as social distancing (about three metres from anyone), and be socially
responsible, don't go to public places and infect others — for young people
this would be hard, but absolutely necessary — the spread is most rampant in
this age group between 16 and 25 years.

When the illness does not go away after a few days or when you are
deteriorating, get to the nearest hospital. Most importantly, be very aware and
responsible!

Finally, keep abreast of all new developments, because these are evolving all
the time. With keen awareness, prudent care, early detection and social
responsibility, correct and prompt use of antiviral and other support medical
care, and later mass specific vaccination, we can overcome this novel H1N1
flu! But it will take time, patience, public cooperation, much concerted effort
and consume great resources.

CRY your heart out !

There was a study done where a control group of 100 people were divided into two :
50 people watched a very funny, tears-of laughter type movie ;
and another 50 watched a very sad and tears of compassion type movie.

At the end of the sessions researchers collected the 'happy tears' and the 'sad tears' with eye droppers.

They found that 'happy tears' are made up of brine...salt water and not a great deal else.
However the 'sad tears' were found to contain the very same chemicals and enzymes that are found in tumors, ulcers and other such lumps and bumps and sicknesses through out the body.

This test concluded that the body, when crying in sadness etc is literally flushing out all of the toxic-chemicals that accumulate and are a part of the sadness /heartache experience.
Therefore if one holds back those tears, those toxic-waters will find somewhere else to deposit themselves... .and prolonged lack-of-crying-release will guarantee that the body will accumulate a huge amount of internal pollution and toxicity that should have been released through the tears........is it any wonder that the eyes sting so much when we hold back our tears?'

LESSON FROM THE STUDY : CRY YOUR HEART OUT WHEN YOU ARE SAD, LONELY, ALONE, DEPRESSED, ETC.....


IT IS GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH!